Factors Affecting Fraudulent Financial Statements Using Fraud Triangle Analysis (Study of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Bursa Efek Indonesia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37802/jamb.v5i2.706Keywords:
Financial Report Fraud, Fraud Triangle, F-ScoreAbstract
This research aims to determine the influence of the fraud triangle on the influence of existence financial statement fraud. The factors in the fraud triangle consist of three indicators these include (1) Preasure is proxied by financial targets (ROA) and financial stability (ACchange), (2) Opportunity is proxied by Nature of Industry (Receivable) and Ineffective Monitoring (IND), (3) Rationalization is proxied by Change in auditor (CiA). There are 5 (five) independent variables that are hypothesized to influence financial statement fraud and The dependent variable fraud (F-score) is used to determine the presence of fraudulent reports finance. This research uses a quantitative approach with a sample consisting of 180 people manufacturing companies listed on the Bursa Efek Indonesiafor the observation period 2019 - 2023 using the purposive sampling method and multiple linear analysis using SPSS software version 16. The research results show that the financial stability variable (ACchange) has a positive effect, Nature of Industry (Receivable) has a negative effect, and Ineffective Monitoring (IND), has an effect negative, towards fraudulent financial statements. Meanwhile, the financial target (ROA) and variables change in auditor (CiA), has no effect on fraudulent financial statements in the company manufacturers listed on the Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) for the period 2019 -2023.
Downloads
References
Karyono. (2013). Forensic Fraud. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Susianti, N. K. D., & Yasa, I. B. A. (2015). Pengaruh Variabel Fraud Triangle Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Valid, 12(4).
Trihargo, G. C. (2016). Survai Fraud Indonesia : Dalam A. o. Examiners, Survai Fraud Indonesia 2016. ACFE Indonesia Chapter, 19(4).
AICPA. (2017). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Annual Update for Accountants and Auditors, 8(4).
Ghozali. (2019). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Widarjono, A. (2015). Statistika Terapan Dengan Excel dan SPPS. In Edisi Pertama.
Rachmawati, K., & Marsono. (2014). Perspektif Fraud Triangle terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Berdasarkan Sanksi dari Bapepam Periode 2008-2012). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(3).
Septriyani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1).
Chomariza, N. A., & Suhendi, C. (2020). Analisis Fraud Triangle terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Di Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2016 – 2018. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU), 3(2), 217–241.
Skousen, C. J., & Twedt, B. J. (2009). Fraud Score Analysis in Emerging Markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(3).
Tiffani, L. (2009). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangel pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2).
Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 10(3).
Rahmawati, A., & Nurmala, P. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Tangible Journal, 4(2).
Lestari, P. A. S., & Gunawan. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Learning Implementation of Primary and Secondary School Levels. Indonesian Journal of Elementary and Childhood Education, 1(2).
Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2).
